2026-27 Academic Theme: Critical Thinking in the Age of AI
The Annual Academic Theme: An Introduction
Since its inception in 1994, the Âé¶¹APP theme has brought our communities together for numerous activities and programs. Beginning in 2006, an annual colloquium of faculty members has chosen the theme and a corresponding reading to share with other faculty, students, staff, and the larger community. We feature discussions in and outside of our classes and organize events in order to promote larger conversations about the theme. These events have provided a platform for multiple voices to be heard on such significant topics as health and social justice, immigration, and bioethics.
The UMA Colloquium is pleased to announce that the 2026-27 Academic Theme is Critical Thinking in the Age of AI.
Critical thinking in the age of AI is a strong academic theme because it reaches across the full range of programs at UMA. It sits at the center of Data Science, Computer Information Systems, and Cybersecurity, where students study directly what these systems can and cannot do. It speaks to the work of writing and interpretation in our English and writing programs and across the arts, where the question of what only a human can make has taken on new urgency. It reaches into the professional fields our students enter, from Education and Nursing to Business and Justice Studies, where good judgment cannot be outsourced. And in areas of study like Philosophy and Psychology, it raises fundamental questions about sound reasoning and the biases embedded in the data these systems learn from. Few themes touch so many corners of the university at once, which makes this one a natural fit for the true interdisciplinary nature of knowledge and problem-solving. Because generative AI tools can now produce fluent text, images, and analysis on demand, every field is being asked the same underlying question: what does it mean to reason, create, and know something for ourselves? That question does not belong to any single department or program, which makes it a fitting theme for the whole university and a natural fit for the true interdisciplinary nature of knowledge and problem solving.
Another component of this year’s academic theme is the adoption of a single theme-related book by a number of classes across the curriculum: by John Warner.
The emergence of generative AI is a historically significant development that is already reshaping how we work, learn, write, and communicate. Warner’s book argues that writing is a form of thinking and feeling that AI cannot replace, and makes the case for treating the expansion of generative AI as an occasion to reckon with what the real work of writing is for. Questions of academic integrity, authorship, misinformation, data privacy, labor, and the environmental costs of the technology are evolving daily, which keeps a fast-moving subject squarely timely and grounded in our students’ lived experience.
Critical thinking in the age of AI also speaks directly to many of our general education themes, and it dovetails especially well with the change in General Education requirements that now include Critical Thinking as a documented component. To examine these tools well is to practice exactly the habits general education aims to cultivate: weighing evidence, questioning sources, distinguishing genuine reasoning from convincing imitation, and considering the ethical and equitable implications of how a technology is built and used. The theme invites discussion of ethics and cultural diversity as well, including who is represented in the data these systems learn from, who benefits, and who is left out. In this way, studying critical thinking in the age of AI challenges us to analyze systemic issues, question the norms of our moment, and equip our students to make thoughtful, informed decisions long after they leave UMA.
The Colloquium Committee looks forward to working with the faculty, staff, and students for a productive academic theme for the year.
The Academic Theme is addressed at Convocation in the fall and then through the spring INT/HON seminar, culminating at the in April.
Thanks to all the faculty colloquium participants this year:
Matt Dube (co-chair), Lorien Lake-Corral (co-chair)
Leigh Alley, Phillip Buckley, Cindy Dean, Greg Fahy, Les French, Vickie Ireland, Anne Jordan, Michelle Lisi, Ruth Lyons, Donna Maher, Sharon Sawyer, Tim Surrette, & Rebecca White